Dubai, United Arab Emirates — April 2, 2026
Amid escalating tensions between the United States and Iran, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has issued a direct message to the American public, questioning whether the ongoing conflict truly serves their interests.
In a detailed four-page statement shared on X, Pezeshkian said both confrontation and dialogue remain possible paths between Iran and the United States, but emphasized that the direction forward ultimately depends on the American people.
‘Is This War in America’s Interest?’
Pezeshkian raised pointed questions about the justification for the conflict, asking whether Iran posed a real threat that warranted military action.
“Is this war truly serving the interests of the American people?” he asked, urging citizens to reflect on the consequences of continued escalation.
He stressed that the choice between conflict and diplomacy is “real and consequential,” adding that it could shape the future of generations to come.
Dialogue or Confrontation: A Strategic Choice
The Iranian president said Tehran remains open to both dialogue and confrontation, depending on how events unfold.
He warned, however, that Iran is fully prepared to respond to any form of aggression and would defend itself if attacked. At the same time, he suggested that diplomatic engagement remains a viable path to de-escalation.
🇮🇱 Accusations Against Israel
Pezeshkian accused Israel of drawing the United States into the conflict, suggesting that Washington is acting as a proxy in the ongoing war.
He questioned whether the “America First” principle truly reflects current U.S. policy priorities, implying that external influences may be shaping American involvement.
Iran’s Military Posture and Self-Defense Claim
The Iranian leader asserted that, despite possessing significant military capabilities, Iran has historically avoided aggressive actions.
He described Iran’s recent actions toward neighboring countries as “balanced responses” rooted in legitimate self-defense. However, he reiterated that Iran is fully capable of withstanding and responding to any military aggression.
A Warning on Global Consequences
Pezeshkian cautioned that the world stands at a critical juncture, where continued confrontation could prove costly and ineffective.
He emphasized that history has shown Iran’s resilience, noting that past aggressors have faded while Iran has endured.
“The choice between confrontation and dialogue will determine the future,” he said.
Conclusion
As the U.S.-Iran conflict intensifies, Pezeshkian’s message highlights a dual-track approach—warning of readiness for conflict while leaving the door open for diplomacy. His remarks add a new dimension to an already volatile geopolitical situation, with implications that could extend far beyond the region.
