INVC NEWS
New Delhi : WhatsApp communication meat legal criteria for FIR registration, says High Court. A historic ruling by the High Court permits the use of WhatsApp for lodging police complaints FIR. Discover how this decision is modernizing legal protocols in India .
WhatsApp: A Valid Medium for Police Complaints?
In an era where technology has seamlessly merged with our daily routines, legal systems are evolving to keep pace. One such stride was taken by the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court, which recently gave its nod to using WhatsApp as a legitimate medium for filing police complaints.
Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court’s Bold Move
The significance of this decision resonates with millions, especially when courts across India express varied opinions on the weight of WhatsApp as a credible source in legal matters. This landmark verdict by the High Court came to the fore while hearing a contentious property dispute case. The primary issue? An FIR had been filed based on a complaint received through WhatsApp.
The complainant in this case approached the Chief Judicial Magistrate in Srinagar after perceiving that the Srinagar Police had been lax in their response. The Magistrate court, understanding the gravity of the matter, instructed the Srinagar Police to delve deeper and probe the situation. This act of registering the FIR based on a WhatsApp complaint was subsequently contested at the High Court, with the argument stemming from the traditional modes prescribed under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).
Understanding the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)
Under the established regulations of Section 154 of the CrPC, the initiation for a cognizable offense demands a formal communication to the police officer. When delivered orally, there’s a mandate for the officer to put it into writing, followed by the complainant’s signature. If these steps aren’t heeded, leading to non-registration of the FIR, the CrPC further empowers the complainant to appeal to the station’s in-charge.
But, what happens when modern technology intersects with these age-old procedures?
Deciphering the High Court’s Stance
In a profound interpretation, Justice Javed Iqbal Wani of the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court expressed that the provisions of Section 154 of the CrPC were satisfied. Drawing attention to the WhatsApp conversation between the complainant and the Station House Officer (SHO), Justice Wani observed that this digital interaction was in line with the CrPC’s stipulations. In his words, the facts portrayed “substantial compliance with Sections 154(1) and 154(3) of the CrPC.”
WhatsApp in the Legal Spectrum: A Pan-India View
Despite this progressive stance, the legal landscape across India has been fragmented on the admissibility of WhatsApp exchanges in courts. In 2021, a notable pronouncement by the Supreme Court underscored the transient nature of WhatsApp communications. The apex court opined that such messages lacked tangible worth, emphasizing their ephemeral nature.
Divergently, in the 2020 case of ‘Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprise vs KS Infraspace LLP Ltd’, the court deemed that messages were an amalgamation of oral communications, hence subject to the court’s interpretative discretion. Such varied judgments point towards the evolving nature of digital evidence in Indian jurisprudence.
Conclusion
The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court’s decision marks a significant step in modernizing the judicial process. By acknowledging WhatsApp as a medium for lodging police complaints, the court has paved the way for potential digital revolutions in legal protocols.
As technology continues to weave its way deeper into our lives, it remains to be seen how the legal fraternity across India will align its practices, ensuring justice remains both contemporary and accessible.
