The cape, the symbol, the indestructible aura—Superman has long represented invincibility and unwavering morality. But James Gunn’s 2025 vision challenges everything we’ve come to expect. Is this still the Man of Steel—or has he become the Man of Feel? Released on July 11, 2025, this rebooted attempt to humanize Superman offers eye-catching visuals, bold storytelling choices, and a performance that has sparked widespread debate. Here’s our in-depth review.
A Superman Who Bleeds — And Not Just Physically
The film begins not with glory, but with defeat. David Corenswet’s Superman is introduced as battered, vulnerable, and almost pitiful. He isn’t soaring over Metropolis with confidence—he’s downed by machines, wounded not only by metal but by public opinion.
This creative decision jars expectations. Viewers enter expecting triumph but are handed turmoil. The bold deviation may appeal to some, especially those hungry for emotional depth, but it risks alienating fans who admire Superman for his sheer dominance.
Storyline: A Simplistic Battle Dressed in Political Overtones
Set against the fictional backdrop of Jarhanpur, a nation eyed by the power-hungry Boravia, the plot follows Superman as he attempts to intervene in the looming invasion. But rather than receiving praise, America turns on him, accusing him of betrayal. Enter Lex Luthor, the bald, bitter tech tycoon who manipulates public sentiment and exploits the hero’s downfall.
While the story flirts with geopolitics and betrayal, its execution feels underdeveloped. There’s a stark mismatch between the light-hearted tone of certain scenes and the gravity of the themes. Gunn seems torn between delivering a political thriller and a children’s cartoon.
Cast Performance: Mixed Bag with One Undeniable Star
David Corenswet as Superman
Corenswet brings a fresh yet perplexing interpretation. He looks the part—chiseled jawline, confident gaze—but as the narrative progresses, his Superman feels neutered, not noble. He doesn’t grow into the cape; he shrinks under it. The emotional outbursts, the repetitive beatdowns, and his inability to rise decisively leave audiences conflicted. Is this what growth looks like, or simply weakness disguised as character building?
Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane
As Lois, Brosnahan stands out. Intelligent, assertive, and emotionally grounded, she is the moral spine of the story. Her chemistry with Corenswet is palpable and serves as the film’s emotional anchor.
Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor
Lex Luthor is supposed to be a brilliant, ruthless manipulator. But Hoult’s portrayal, while visually intriguing in his clean-shaven, cold-blooded form, lacks menace. His motivations feel more cartoonish than chilling. He isn’t terrifying—just annoying.
Krypto Steals the Show
Enter Krypto, Superman’s CGI-crafted superdog—without a doubt, the film’s heart and humor. In a film obsessed with breaking Superman, Krypto delivers levity, charm, and emotional resonance. From saving the day to stealing scenes, Krypto is more “super” than Superman himself.
James Gunn’s Direction: A Genre Crisis
Known for quirky, sharp, and emotionally resonant filmmaking, James Gunn disappoints here. Despite previously breathing life into ensemble hits like Guardians of the Galaxy, here he fails to balance tones.
Gunn seems indecisive. Is he making a parody of superhero tropes? A heartfelt drama? A children’s film with adult dilemmas? The result is a tonal whiplash that keeps viewers from emotionally investing. The film tries to be profound but feels too simplistic. It tries to be gritty but ends up being awkwardly sentimental.
Visual Effects and Music: Glossy but Forgettable
As expected, the VFX department delivers. Explosions, space battles, and fight sequences are beautifully rendered. The technology does justice to the superhuman aspects, even when the script doesn’t. Particularly impressive are the machines created by LexCorp—sleek, terrifying, and symbolically overpowering.
However, the background score lacks punch. It doesn’t elevate the moments it should. Compared to the iconic themes from past Superman films, this soundtrack fades fast from memory.
Symbolism vs. Spectacle: What’s the Real Message?
At its core, the film seems to ask: What makes someone super? Is it strength, sacrifice, or perseverance?
Superman in this story is repeatedly punished for choosing peace over power. He is beaten by machines, betrayed by citizens, and manipulated by media. Gunn’s Superman is a Christ-like figure, sacrificing popularity and strength for an ideal. But in doing so, he loses the thrill that made audiences fall in love with him.
Meanwhile, Krypto—free from the burdens of morality and symbolism—rises as a beacon of hope and reliability. That’s the irony: the superdog, not the superhero, brings the action and energy the audience craves.
Key Highlights and Lowlights
What Works:
Krypto’s screen presence: Irresistible charm and impeccable timing.
Lois Lane’s character arc: Strong, thoughtful, and necessary.
Stunning visuals: The film is a visual treat, from costume design to aerial sequences.
What Fails:
Superman’s portrayal: Too weak, too emotional, not enough heroic rise.
Confused genre execution: Childish comedy clashing with adult politics.
Forgettable antagonist: Lex Luthor lacks intimidation and complexity.
Final Verdict: Is It Worth Watching?
Rating: ★★★★☆ (4/5)
If you’re searching for nostalgic Superman glory, this film may leave you frustrated. But if you’re ready to embrace vulnerability over valor, this bold reimagining offers food for thought.
The younger crowd will likely enjoy the vibrant sequences and Krypto’s antics. Adults might struggle with the lack of a truly cathartic moment. Still, the film is not without merit—it opens up space for a deeper, flawed superhero and sets the stage for potentially richer sequels.
Just be warned: you’re not watching Superman the savior—you’re watching Superman the sufferer.
Should You Bring the Kids?
Despite its childlike tone, the film contains two intimate kissing scenes. While nothing graphic, parental discretion is advised. Otherwise, the film feels tailor-made for younger viewers, especially thanks to Krypto’s comedic brilliance.
Conclusion: A Risky Reboot With a Powerful Pup
James Gunn’s “Superman” (2025) is ambitious but uneven. David Corenswet’s Superman is humane but frustratingly passive, while Krypto delivers the action, emotion, and light-heartedness fans were hoping for from the hero himself.
In the end, this isn’t the Superman film we expected—but perhaps, in its own flawed way, it’s the one this generation needs. Whether that’s enough to make it a classic, only time (and box office returns) will tell.
